Associations between contraceptive availability and rate of subsequent legal abortions in Colombia: A historical cohort analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To describe factors associated with subsequent abortions in Colombia and evaluate whether high-efficacy contraceptive availability (IUD) post-index abortion was associated with higher efficacy contraceptive initiation and fewer subsequent abortions within 2 years. METHODS: The study population comprised patients aged 15-44 years who underwent index abortion in 2017 at four clinics in Bogotá, Colombia. Using charts, we conducted a retrospective cohort study with 2-year follow-up (2017-2019) after the index abortion for outcomes of contraceptive initiation and subsequent abortion. We evaluated associations between demographic or clinical characteristics and outcomes using Pearson chi-square and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 9175 patients with index abortion, 3409 (37.2%) initiated an intrauterine device (IUD) and 467 (5.1%) had a subsequent abortion within the study period (2017-2019). IUD availability (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-1.93) and insurance use (aOR, 5.03; 95% CI, 4.37-5.78) were associated with high-efficacy contraceptive initiation; medication abortion was inversely associated (aOR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.22-0.27). Initiation of no (aOR, 4.94; 95% CI, 3.59-6.80) or moderate-efficacy (injection: aOR, 4.21 [95% CI, 3.14-5.62]; oral contraceptive pill: aOR, 4.60 [95% CI, 3.21-6.59]) methods were associated with subsequent abortion. CONCLUSION: Subsequent abortion is inversely associated with initiated postabortion contraceptive efficacy, which is modifiable on a systems level by improving access to effective postabortion contraception.

The effectiveness of peer health coaching in improving glycemic control among low-income patients with diabetes: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Although self-management support improves diabetes outcomes, it is not consistently provided in health care settings strained for time and resources. One proposed solution to personnel and funding shortages is to utilize peer coaches, patients trained to provide diabetes education and support to other patients. Coaches share similar experiences about living with diabetes and are able to reach patients within and beyond the health care setting. Given the limited body of evidence that demonstrates peer coaching significantly improves chronic disease care, this present study examines the impact of peer coaching delivered in a primary care setting on diabetes outcomes. METHODS/DESIGN: The aim of this multicenter, randomized control trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of utilizing peer coaches to improve clinical outcomes and self-management skills in low-income patients with poorly controlled diabetes. A total of 400 patients from six primary health centers based in San Francisco that serve primarily low-income populations will be randomized to receive peer coaching (n = 200) or usual care (n = 200) over 6 months. Patients in the peer coach group receive coaching from patients with diabetes who are trained and mentored as peer coaches. The primary outcome is change in HbA1c. Secondary outcomes include change in: systolic blood pressure, body mass index (BMI), LDL cholesterol, diabetes self-care activities, medication adherence, diabetes-related quality of life, diabetes self-efficacy, and depression. Clinical values (HbA1c, LDL cholesterol and blood pressure) and self-reported diabetes self-efficacy and self-care activities are measured at baseline and after 6 months for patients and coaches. Peer coaches are also assessed at 12 months. DISCUSSION: Patients with diabetes, who are trained as peer health coaches, are uniquely poised to provide diabetes self management support and education to patients. This study is designed to investigate the impact of peer health coaching in patients with poorly controlled diabetes. Additionally, we will assess disease outcomes in patients with well controlled diabetes who are trained and work as peer health coaches. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01040806.